急求<安娜卡列
97年版Leo Tolstoy's Anna Karenina is gi360问答ven lavish treatment in this lush filmed version by direct好or Bernard Rose. The cinematograp独杀题非防半hy and set design, 房and extravagant costumes are lovely and impressive to look at. That and the swee谁握ping orchestral score, containing music by Tchaikovsky, Rachmaninoff, and Prokofiev, are almost worth the price of admission by themselves. As far as the story itself is concerned, some pieces of it work and some don't. The central love s改热证静止行龙影老tory, between Anna Karenina a失争这听写威力革均感nd Count Vronsky, is compelling and tragic. Anna and the C片皇再快危ount have an affair, causing much talk. Due to the double sta真危推杨完ndards of the time, Vronsky may still hold his head high in society, while Anna is forced to stay inside and hide her shame. There's the 居matter of Anna's confused, unfeeling husband — Anna's fight for a divorce and custody of their son is furious and futile. Sean Bean's portrayal of Vronsky, for some reason, didn't quite hit the mark for me. On occasion, I felt as if I were on the verge of understanding his character问穿希据地放诗马用不, but I never did. Sophie Marceau, in the title role, fared better. She ma善愿啊坏官握乡初kes the helplessness of Anna's situation is manifestly clear, and the tragedies in her life are moving, and the moments that foreshadow these are effective. The movie fails, however, to do justi活满济鸡乎别便ce to the rest of Tolstoy's epic novel, involving among other things a secondary love affair b打极成防地卷住兴该争etween Constantin Levin and Kitty Scherb米无轴于推于系够atsky. These plot elements are given too cursory a treatment and come off like an arbitrary soap opera. Parades of marriages, births, affairs, and family squabbles are ushered through one scene after the next, and Tolstoy's ideas and ideals are neatly a打山远由裂voided. One must cut slack, I suppose, for a film that compresses a novel of nearly a thousand pages into 108 minutes of screen time. On the other hand, I'd have preferred the screenwriter to have trimmed the novel's scope rather than its depth. Is this movie version worth seeing? Yes, but just barely. Enough of the substance of the primary relationship is preserved to make the film meaningful, and as I mentioned before, the music and set design are fabulous. It's just too bad it wasn't fleshed out a little more.
